Comparisons of Academic Researchers’ and Physical Education Teachers’ Perspectives on the Utilization of the Tactical Games Model

Stephen Harvey, Shane Pill

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Research commentary suggests the utilization of Tactical Games Models (TGMs) only exists in isolated instances, particularly where teachers demonstrate true fidelity to these models. In contrast, many academics have adopted TGMs into their courses. Consequently, the purpose of this study was to investigate reasons for this disparity. Participants were 44 academics and 80 physical education teachers. Results showed that academics provided a myriad of reasons why teachers may not use TGMs, although all agreed on the need for increased teacher professional development in TGMs. Physical education teachers' outlined that numerous competing versions of TGMs was confusing and they required more hands-on examples of TGMs. Results further highlighted disparities between academics and teachers' conceptual understanding and pedagogical applications of TGMs. There is a critical need to create improved connections between academics and physical education teachers, which could be achieved through the extended examination of the micropedagogies of teachers practice in TGMs.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)313-323
    Number of pages11
    JournalJOURNAL OF TEACHING IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION
    Volume35
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparisons of Academic Researchers’ and Physical Education Teachers’ Perspectives on the Utilization of the Tactical Games Model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this