Comparisons of the utility of researcher-defined and participant-defined successful ageing

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)


    Aim: To investigate the impact of different approaches for measuring 'successful ageing', four alternative researcher and participant definitions were compared, including a novel measure informed by cluster analysis. Rates of successful ageing were explored, as were their relative associations with age and measures of successful adaptation, to assess construct validity. Method: Participants, aged over 65, were recruited from community-based organisations. Questionnaires (assessing successful ageing, lifestyle activities and selective optimisation with compensation) were completed by 317 individuals. Results: Successful ageing ranged from 11.4% to 87.4%, with higher rates evident from participant definitions. Though dependent upon the definition, successful agers were typically younger, reported greater engagement with lifestyle activities and more frequent optimisation. Conclusions: While the current study suggested an improved classification algorithm using a common research definition, future research should explore how subjective and objective aspects of successful ageing may be combined to derive a measure relevant to policy and practice.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)E7-E12
    Number of pages6
    JournalAustralasian Journal on Ageing
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2016


    • Ageing
    • Cluster analysis
    • Lifestyle
    • Self-appraisal


    Dive into the research topics of 'Comparisons of the utility of researcher-defined and participant-defined successful ageing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this