Concordance and acceptability of electric stimulation therapy: A randomised controlled trial

C. Miller, W. McGuiness, S. Wilson, K. Cooper, T. Swanson, D. Rooney, N. Piller, M. Woodward

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: A pilot single-blinded randomised controlled trial (RCT) was conducted to examine concordance with and acceptability of electric stimulation therapy (EST) in patients with venous leg ulcers (VLUs) who had not tolerated moderate to high compression. Method: Participants were randomised to the intervention group (n=15) or a placebo control group (n=8) in which EST was used four times daily for 20 minutes per session. Participants were monitored for eight weeks during which time concordance with the treatment and perceptions of the treatment were assessed. Results: Concordance with the total recommended treatment time was 71.4% for the intervention group and 82.9% for the control group; a difference that was not statistically significant. Participants rated EST as acceptable (84.6% intervention; 83.3% control), only two participants, both from the placebo control group, would not be willing to use EST again. The majority considered EST easier to use than compression (68.4%). Conclusion: EST was a practical and acceptable treatment among people who have been unable to tolerate moderate to high compression therapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)508-513
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Wound Care
Volume26
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Aug 2017

Keywords

  • Compression therapy
  • Concordance
  • Electric stimulation therapy
  • Venous leg ulcer

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Concordance and acceptability of electric stimulation therapy: A randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this