Consensus statement: minimal criteria for reporting the systemic inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass

R Landis, John Murkin, David Stump, Robert Baker, J Arrowsmith, Filip De Somer, S Dain, W Dobkowski, J Ellis, F Falter, G Fischer, J Hammon, R Jonas, R Kramer, Donald Likosky, P Milsom, Mike Poullis, E Verrier, K Walley, S Westaby

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    26 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The lack of established cause and effect between putative mediators of inflammation and adverse clinical outcomes has been responsible for many failed anti-inflammatory interventions in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Candidate interventions that impress in preclinical trials by suppressing a given inflammation marker might fail at the clinical trial stage because the marker of interest is not linked causally to an adverse outcome. Alternatively, there exist examples in which pharmaceutical agents or other interventions improve clinical outcomes but for which we are uncertain of any anti-inflammatory mechanism. The Outcomes consensus panel made 3 recommendations in 2009 for the conduct of clinical trials focused on the systemic inflammatory response. This panel was tasked with updating, as well as simplifying, a previous consensus statement. The present recommendations for investigators are the following: (1) Measure at least 1 inflammation marker, defined in broad terms; (2) measure at least 1 clinical end point, drawn from a list of practical yet clinically meaningful end points suggested by the consensus panel; and (3) report a core set of CPB and perfusion criteria that may be linked to outcomes. Our collective belief is that adhering to these simple consensus recommendations will help define the influence of CPB practice on the systemic inflammatory response, advance our understanding of causal inflammatory mechanisms, and standardize the reporting of research findings in the peer-reviewed literature.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)E116-E123
    Number of pages8
    JournalHeart Surgery Forum
    Volume13
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2010

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Consensus statement: minimal criteria for reporting the systemic inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Landis, R., Murkin, J., Stump, D., Baker, R., Arrowsmith, J., De Somer, F., Dain, S., Dobkowski, W., Ellis, J., Falter, F., Fischer, G., Hammon, J., Jonas, R., Kramer, R., Likosky, D., Milsom, P., Poullis, M., Verrier, E., Walley, K., & Westaby, S. (2010). Consensus statement: minimal criteria for reporting the systemic inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass. Heart Surgery Forum, 13(2), E116-E123. https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20101022