TY - JOUR
T1 - Core requirements of frailty screening in the emergency department
T2 - an international Delphi consensus study
AU - Moloney, Elizabeth
AU - O’Donovan, Mark R.
AU - Carpenter, Christopher R.
AU - Salvi, Fabio
AU - Dent, Elsa
AU - Mooijaart, Simon
AU - Hoogendijk, Emiel O.
AU - Woo, Jean
AU - Morley, John
AU - Hubbard, Ruth E.
AU - Cesari, Matteo
AU - Ahern, Emer
AU - Romero-Ortuno, Roman
AU - McNamara, Rosa
AU - O’Keefe, Anne
AU - Healy, Ann
AU - Heeren, Pieter
AU - McLoughlin, Darren
AU - Deasy, Conor
AU - Martin, Louise
AU - Brousseau, Audrey Anne
AU - Sezgin, Duygu
AU - Bernard, Paul
AU - McLoughlin, Kara
AU - Sri-On, Jiraporn
AU - Melady, Don
AU - Edge, Lucinda
AU - O’Shaughnessy, Ide
AU - Van Damme, Jill
AU - Cardona, Magnolia
AU - Kirby, Jennifer
AU - Southerland, Lauren
AU - Costa, Andrew
AU - Sinclair, Douglas
AU - Maxwell, Cathy
AU - Doyle, Marie
AU - Lewis, Ebony
AU - Corcoran, Grace
AU - Eagles, Debra
AU - Dockery, Frances
AU - Conroy, Simon
AU - Timmons, Suzanne
AU - O’Caoimh, Rónán
PY - 2024/2
Y1 - 2024/2
N2 - Introduction: Frailty is associated with adverse outcomes among patients attending emergency departments (EDs). While multiple frailty screens are available, little is known about which variables are important to incorporate and how best to facilitate accurate, yet prompt ED screening. To understand the core requirements of frailty screening in ED, we conducted an international, modified, electronic two-round Delphi consensus study. Methods: A two-round electronic Delphi involving 37 participants from 10 countries was undertaken. Statements were generated from a prior systematic review examining frailty screening instruments in ED (logistic, psychometric and clinimetric properties). Reflexive thematic analysis generated a list of 56 statements for Round 1 (August–September 2021). Four main themes identified were: (i) principles of frailty screening, (ii) practicalities and logistics, (iii) frailty domains and (iv) frailty risk factors. Results: In Round 1, 13/56 statements (23%) were accepted. Following feedback, 22 new statements were created and 35 were re-circulated in Round 2 (October 2021). Of these, 19 (54%) were finally accepted. It was agreed that ideal frailty screens should be short (<5 min), multidimensional and well-calibrated across the spectrum of frailty, reflecting baseline status 2–4 weeks before presentation. Screening should ideally be routine, prompt (<4 h after arrival) and completed at first contact in ED. Functional ability, mobility, cognition, medication use and social factors were identified as the most important variables to include. Conclusions: Although a clear consensus was reached on important requirements of frailty screening in ED, and variables to include in an ideal screen, more research is required to operationalise screening in clinical practice.
AB - Introduction: Frailty is associated with adverse outcomes among patients attending emergency departments (EDs). While multiple frailty screens are available, little is known about which variables are important to incorporate and how best to facilitate accurate, yet prompt ED screening. To understand the core requirements of frailty screening in ED, we conducted an international, modified, electronic two-round Delphi consensus study. Methods: A two-round electronic Delphi involving 37 participants from 10 countries was undertaken. Statements were generated from a prior systematic review examining frailty screening instruments in ED (logistic, psychometric and clinimetric properties). Reflexive thematic analysis generated a list of 56 statements for Round 1 (August–September 2021). Four main themes identified were: (i) principles of frailty screening, (ii) practicalities and logistics, (iii) frailty domains and (iv) frailty risk factors. Results: In Round 1, 13/56 statements (23%) were accepted. Following feedback, 22 new statements were created and 35 were re-circulated in Round 2 (October 2021). Of these, 19 (54%) were finally accepted. It was agreed that ideal frailty screens should be short (<5 min), multidimensional and well-calibrated across the spectrum of frailty, reflecting baseline status 2–4 weeks before presentation. Screening should ideally be routine, prompt (<4 h after arrival) and completed at first contact in ED. Functional ability, mobility, cognition, medication use and social factors were identified as the most important variables to include. Conclusions: Although a clear consensus was reached on important requirements of frailty screening in ED, and variables to include in an ideal screen, more research is required to operationalise screening in clinical practice.
KW - Delphi consensus
KW - emergency department
KW - frailty screening
KW - older adult
KW - older people
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85185614433&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ageing/afae013
DO - 10.1093/ageing/afae013
M3 - Article
C2 - 38369629
AN - SCOPUS:85185614433
SN - 0002-0729
VL - 53
JO - Age and Ageing
JF - Age and Ageing
IS - 2
M1 - afae013
ER -