Correction to: Comparison of in vitro fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection on live birth rates in couples with non-male factor infertility and advanced maternal age

Nicole O. McPherson; Andrew D. Vincent; Leanne Pacella-Ince; Kelton Tremellen

doi:10.1007/s10815-021-02076-6

Correction to: Comparison of in vitro fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection on live birth rates in couples with non-male factor infertility and advanced maternal age

Nicole O. McPherson, Andrew D. Vincent, Leanne Pacella-Ince, Kelton Tremellen

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

Abstract

The original article unfortunately contained a mistake in the first line of the Conclusion section.

“In couples with advanced maternal age and non-male factor infertility, it appears that standard IVF insemination increased the chance of a live birth at least 9-fold compared with ICSI Insemination”

When it should read

“In couples with advanced maternal age and non-male factor infertility, it appears that standard IVF insemination increased the chance of a live birth at least 2-fold compared with ICSI insemination”

The original article has been corrected.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	679-679
Number of pages	1
Journal	Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
Volume	38
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02076-6
Publication status	Published - Mar 2021

Keywords

correction
erratum
Corrigendum
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
Repromed
vitro fertilisation
intracytoplasmic sperm injection

Access to Document

10.1007/s10815-021-02076-6Licence: In Copyright

Cite this

@article{adcfeda4bd364082ad19e25b2afcf2e0,

title = "Correction to: Comparison of in vitro fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection on live birth rates in couples with non-male factor infertility and advanced maternal age",

abstract = "The original article unfortunately contained a mistake in the first line of the Conclusion section.“In couples with advanced maternal age and non-male factor infertility, it appears that standard IVF insemination increased the chance of a live birth at least 9-fold compared with ICSI Insemination”When it should read“In couples with advanced maternal age and non-male factor infertility, it appears that standard IVF insemination increased the chance of a live birth at least 2-fold compared with ICSI insemination”The original article has been corrected.",

keywords = "correction, erratum, Corrigendum, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Repromed, vitro fertilisation, intracytoplasmic sperm injection",

author = "McPherson, {Nicole O.} and Vincent, {Andrew D.} and Leanne Pacella-Ince and Kelton Tremellen",

year = "2021",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1007/s10815-021-02076-6",

language = "English",

volume = "38",

pages = "679--679",

journal = "Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics",

issn = "1058-0468",

publisher = "Springer New York",

number = "3",

}

Correction to: Comparison of in vitro fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection on live birth rates in couples with non-male factor infertility and advanced maternal age. / McPherson, Nicole O.; Vincent, Andrew D.; Pacella-Ince, Leanne et al.
In: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Vol. 38, No. 3, 03.2021, p. 679-679.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correction to

T2 - Comparison of in vitro fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection on live birth rates in couples with non-male factor infertility and advanced maternal age

AU - McPherson, Nicole O.

AU - Vincent, Andrew D.

AU - Pacella-Ince, Leanne

AU - Tremellen, Kelton

PY - 2021/3

Y1 - 2021/3

N2 - The original article unfortunately contained a mistake in the first line of the Conclusion section.“In couples with advanced maternal age and non-male factor infertility, it appears that standard IVF insemination increased the chance of a live birth at least 9-fold compared with ICSI Insemination”When it should read“In couples with advanced maternal age and non-male factor infertility, it appears that standard IVF insemination increased the chance of a live birth at least 2-fold compared with ICSI insemination”The original article has been corrected.

AB - The original article unfortunately contained a mistake in the first line of the Conclusion section.“In couples with advanced maternal age and non-male factor infertility, it appears that standard IVF insemination increased the chance of a live birth at least 9-fold compared with ICSI Insemination”When it should read“In couples with advanced maternal age and non-male factor infertility, it appears that standard IVF insemination increased the chance of a live birth at least 2-fold compared with ICSI insemination”The original article has been corrected.

KW - correction

KW - erratum

KW - Corrigendum

KW - Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

KW - Repromed

KW - vitro fertilisation

KW - intracytoplasmic sperm injection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100815484&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10815-021-02076-6

DO - 10.1007/s10815-021-02076-6

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85100815484

SN - 1058-0468

VL - 38

SP - 679

EP - 679

JO - Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

JF - Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

IS - 3

ER -

Correction to: Comparison of in vitro fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection on live birth rates in couples with non-male factor infertility and advanced maternal age

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this