Correction to: Comparison of Time-Lapse Ground-Penetrating Radar and Electrical Resistivity Tomography Surveys for Detecting Pig (Sus spp.) Cadaver Graves in an Australian Environment (Remote Sensing, (2024), 16, 18, (3498), 10.3390/rs16183498)

Victoria Berezowski, Xanthé Mallett, Dilan Seckiner, Isabella Crebert, Justin Ellis, Gabriel C. Rau, Ian Moffat

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In the original publication [1], the images of Figure 7 and Figure 9 were switched on the web page, but were correct in the PDF. The corrected Figure 7 and Figure 9 appear below. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Original languageEnglish
Article number782
Number of pages4
JournalRemote Sensing
Volume17
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2025

Keywords

  • Forensic geophysics
  • Ground-penetrating radar
  • Electrical resistivity tomography
  • Clandestine grave
  • Missing person
  • Homicide

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Correction to: Comparison of Time-Lapse Ground-Penetrating Radar and Electrical Resistivity Tomography Surveys for Detecting Pig (Sus spp.) Cadaver Graves in an Australian Environment (Remote Sensing, (2024), 16, 18, (3498), 10.3390/rs16183498)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this