Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Correction to: Teachers’ perceptions of generative AI in gender-inclusive STEM education: a grounded theory study

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The original online version of this article has been revised. There are certain texts author wants to add as listed below: Ethical approval was obtained from La Trobe University, Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC Approval No.HEC23290) and Flinders University (HREC Approval No.8262). In addition, approvals sought and received from the Victorian Department of Education to conduct research in Departmental Schools (No.24-02-249). All procedures involving human participants were reviewed and approved prior to data collection. Funding: Original: Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions Corrected: Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions. This research received funding from the Google Award for Inclusion Research (AIR).

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages2
JournalEducation and Information Technologies
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 23 Mar 2026

Keywords

  • AI adoption
  • Gender-Inclusive STEM education
  • Generative AI
  • Grounded theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Correction to: Teachers’ perceptions of generative AI in gender-inclusive STEM education: a grounded theory study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this