Abstract
The original online version of this article has been revised. There are certain texts author wants to add as listed below: Ethical approval was obtained from La Trobe University, Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC Approval No.HEC23290) and Flinders University (HREC Approval No.8262). In addition, approvals sought and received from the Victorian Department of Education to conduct research in Departmental Schools (No.24-02-249). All procedures involving human participants were reviewed and approved prior to data collection. Funding: Original: Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions Corrected: Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions. This research received funding from the Google Award for Inclusion Research (AIR).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Education and Information Technologies |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 23 Mar 2026 |
Keywords
- AI adoption
- Gender-Inclusive STEM education
- Generative AI
- Grounded theory
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Correction to: Teachers’ perceptions of generative AI in gender-inclusive STEM education: a grounded theory study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver