Abstract
In the body of the text, the lane descriptions for Fig. 2 are incorrect. More specifically, lanes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 referred to in the text actually correspond to lanes 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 in the figure itself.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 1 |
Journal | FEBS Letters |
Volume | 585 |
Issue number | 24 |
DOIs |
|
Publication status | Published - 15 Nov 2011 |
Externally published | Yes |