Abstract
The authors regret that there was an error in Table 3 of the published article. To amend this error, the following corrections need to be made: in column 6, row 9 (2P, Minor (≤30%), Participant F) the value entered should be zero instead of six; while in column 7, row 9 (2p, UN (unresolved two and three person mixtures), Participant F) the value should be six instead of zero. Consequently, in column 6, row 14 (2P, Minor (≤30%), Total) the value should be 1 instead of seven and in column 7, row 14 (2P, UN, Total) the value should be 74 instead of 68 (see corrected version of Table 3). Note, this correction does not necessitate any alterations to the main text of the manuscript. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | e26 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Forensic Science International: Genetics |
| Volume | 34 |
| Early online date | 20 Mar 2018 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - May 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
\Keywords
- Author correction
- DNA
- Handprints
- Non-self DNA
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “Shedder status—An analysis of self and non-self DNA in multiple handprints by the same individuals over time” [Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 23 (2016) 190–196] (10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.05.005)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver