Abstract
This article discusses the relation between Judaism and political theology in the work of Hermann Cohen and Franz Rosenzweig. Both Cohen and Rosenzweig give an interpretation of Judaism that prioritizes the messianic ideal while maintaining the priority of philosophy over religion. With respect to political theology, this article argues that Cohen and Rosenzweig criticize the priority assigned to the national state in modern politics in favour of a politics that is both cosmopolitan and republican, in so far as it makes the internal relation between peoplehood and rule of law central, and detaches the rule of law from sovereignty. In this sense, the messianism of Cohen and Rosenzweig is opposed to Christian conceptions of the messianic recovered in recent contemporary political theory. The article concludes with a discussion of Rosenzweig's hypothesis concerning how the antagonism between these two forms of messianism are to be reconciled in a new understanding of natural right.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 295-324 |
| Number of pages | 30 |
| Journal | PHILOSOPHY TODAY |
| Volume | 60 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Franz rosenzweig
- Hermann cohen
- Messianism
- Natural right
- Peoplehood
- Political theology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Cosmopolitan political theology in Cohen and Rosenzweig.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver