Cost analysis of injection laryngoplasty performed under local anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia: an Australian perspective

D Chandran, C M Woods, M Schar, N Ma, E H Ooi, T Athanasiadis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To conduct a cost analysis of injection laryngoplasty performed in the operating theatre under local anaesthesia and general anaesthesia. Methods: The retrospective study included patients who had undergone injection laryngoplasty as day cases between July 2013 and March 2016. Cost data were obtained, along with patient demographics, anaesthetic details, type of injectant, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, length of stay, total operating theatre time and surgeon procedure time. Results: A total of 20 cases (general anaesthesia = 6, local anaesthesia = 14) were included in the cost analysis. The mean total cost under general anaesthesia (AU$2865.96 ± 756.29) was significantly higher than that under local anaesthesia (AU$1731.61 ± 290.29) (p < 0.001). The mean operating theatre time, surgeon procedure time and length of stay were all significantly lower under local anaesthesia compared to general anaesthesia. Time variables such as operating theatre time and length of stay were the most significant predictors of the total costs. Conclusion: Procedures performed under local anaesthesia in the operating theatre are associated with shorter operating theatre time and length of stay in the hospital, and provide significant cost savings. Further savings could be achieved if local anaesthesia procedures were performed in the office setting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)168-172
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Laryngology and Otology
Volume132
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Hyaluronic Acid
  • Laryngoplasty
  • Office Surgery
  • Vocal Cord Paralysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cost analysis of injection laryngoplasty performed under local anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia: an Australian perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this