Abstract
Study implications:
–No statistically significant difference in responder rates but higher toxicity and worse QOL
–Higher ketamine costs despite lower costs for other medications
–When costs and QOL are jointly considered, ketamine is neither effective nor cost-effective
–No statistically significant difference in responder rates but higher toxicity and worse QOL
–Higher ketamine costs despite lower costs for other medications
–When costs and QOL are jointly considered, ketamine is neither effective nor cost-effective
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Publication status | Published - May 2015 |
| Event | 13th Australian Palliative Care Conference Melbourne: Fit for the future - Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre, Melbourne, Australia Duration: 1 Sept 2015 → 4 Sept 2015 Conference number: 13 |
Conference
| Conference | 13th Australian Palliative Care Conference Melbourne |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | Australia |
| City | Melbourne |
| Period | 1/09/15 → 4/09/15 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- End-of-life care
- palliative medicine
- ketamine
- pain management
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-effectiveness of subcutaneous ketamine in the management of chronic cancer pain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver