Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Counterpoint: There is a best duration of deep molecular response for treatment-free remission, but it is patient-specific, and that is the challenge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is considerable clinical and scientific interest in identifying reliable predictors of treatment-free remission in chronic myeloid leukaemia. Most predictors have been identified from non-randomized clinical trials or retrospective cohorts that could be subject to bias. The validity of predictive factors, such as duration of treatment or of deep molecular response, has been questioned. We briefly review the relevant data and the potential for bias, arguing that the risk of bias may be overstated, and that accumulating data strongly suggest that depth and duration of molecular response are critical factors to enable us to predict the probability of treatment-free remission.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)24-27
Number of pages4
JournalBritish Journal of Haematology
Volume192
Issue number1
Early online date10 Nov 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • treatment-free remission
  • Deep molecular
  • Chronic myeloid leukaemia
  • bias

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Counterpoint: There is a best duration of deep molecular response for treatment-free remission, but it is patient-specific, and that is the challenge'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this