‘Cowards’ and ‘Scumbags’: Tough talk and men’s violence

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper explores the ways in which particular forms of violence, namely violence against women and one‐punch assaults, are framed in discourses of violence prevention in Australia. In denouncing certain acts, individuals and groups, I show that condemnatory responses—what I refer to here as ‘tough talk’—serve to reinforce, rather than challenge, hierarchical (gendered, raced, classed) difference as normative. Based on assumptions that link violence to particular ‘types’ of men, such approaches overlook the nuance, complexity and contextual meanings of violence. Preventing violence, I argue, requires that we engage with cultures of violence by focusing less on some men’s violence, instead recognising the interconnectedness of gender and other hierarchies of identity as the critical context for violence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)132-147
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy
Volume7
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

Bibliographical note

'This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. '

Keywords

  • Gender
  • Masculinity
  • identity
  • men's violence
  • Violence talk
  • violence prevention
  • violence against women
  • 'one-punch' violence
  • ‘one‐punch’ violence
  • Violence against women
  • Men’s violence
  • Violence prevention
  • Identity

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of '‘Cowards’ and ‘Scumbags’: Tough talk and men’s violence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this