Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Crime Victimisation and Subjective Well-Being: Panel Evidence From Australia

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    45 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper estimates the effect of physical violence and property crimes on subjective well-being in Australia. Our methodology improves on previous contributions by (i) controlling for the endogeneity of victimisation and (ii) analysing the heterogeneous effect of victimisation along the whole distribution of well-being. Using fixed effects panel estimation, we find that both types of crimes reduce reported well-being to a large extent, with physical violence exerting a larger average effect than property crimes. Furthermore, using recently developed panel data quantile regression model with fixed effects, we show that the negative effects of both crimes are highly heterogeneous, with a monotonic decrease over the distribution of subjective well-being.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1448-1463
    Number of pages16
    JournalHealth Economics
    Volume25
    Issue number11
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2016

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
      SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

    Keywords

    • I31
    • JEL: C21
    • quantile regression
    • subjective well-being
    • victimisation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Crime Victimisation and Subjective Well-Being: Panel Evidence From Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this