Abstract
This work describes crossmodal Stroop interference in flavoural, visual, and auditory representations. A mixed design was used with two randomized groups. As a between-subjects factor, words were presented in visual (group 1) or auditory (group 2) forms. Stimulus congruency (congruent, incongruent, and control) was defined as a within-subjects factor. Reaction times and the number of correct answers were recorded. The results showed a minor crossmodal Stroop interference in conditions of congruency. In contrast, with incongruent and control stimuli, reaction times increased and accuracy rates diminished in both experimental groups. Data from the two groups were compared, and it was concluded that the interference was greater when the distractor was written than when it was spoken. These results are discussed in terms of the difficulty of visual linguistic representation and in relation to previous studies.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 91-101 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Revista Latinoamericana de Psicologia |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - May 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Crossmodality
- Flavour
- Hearing
- Stroop
- Vision
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Crossmodal interference between language and flavour'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver