Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cruciferous vegetables improve glycaemic control compared to root/squash vegetables in a randomized, controlled, crossover trial: The VEgetableS for vaScular hEaLth (VESSEL) study

  • Emma L. Connolly
  • , Alex H. Liu
  • , Richard J. Woodman
  • , Armaghan Shafaei
  • , Lisa G. Wood
  • , Richard Mithen
  • , Anthony P. James
  • , Carl J. Schultz
  • , Seng Khee Gan
  • , Catherine P. Bondonno
  • , Joshua R. Lewis
  • , Jonathan M. Hodgson
  • , Lauren C. Blekkenhorst

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
46 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aims: Higher cruciferous vegetable (e.g., broccoli) intake is associated with lower risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, but limited causal evidence exists. We investigated if cruciferous vegetable intake improved glycaemic control compared to root/squash vegetables in non-diabetic adults with elevated blood pressure. 

Materials and Methods: This randomized, controlled, crossover trial consisted of two 2-week dietary interventions (300 g/day cruciferous [active] and root/squash [control] soups with standardized lunch/dinner meals) separated by a 2-week washout. Participants were blinded to the intervention allocation. Glycaemic measures were a pre-specified secondary outcome. Flash glucose monitoring measured interstitial glucose every 15-min throughout both interventions. Mealtimes and consumption were recorded in food diaries. Differences in continuous glucose, glycaemic variability (coefficient of variation [CV]), and overall, lunch, and dinner postprandial glucose response (PPGR; 2-h mean glucose [PPGR 2-h] and area under the curve [AUC]) were assessed using linear mixed-effects regression. 

Results: Eighteen participants (female = 89%) completed the study (median [IQR] age: 68 [66–70 years]). Glycaemic variability was lower in the active versus control (mean difference: −2.0%, 95% CI −2.8, −1.1, p < 0.001). Overall PPGR 2-h and AUC were lower in the active versus control (mean difference: −0.14 mmol/L, 95% CI −0.24, −0.04, p = 0.005 and −20.1 mmol/L × min, 95% CI −34.1, −6.1, p = 0.005, respectively), driven by the dinner PPGR (p = 0.004 and p = 0.003, respectively). There was no difference in mean continuous glucose for active versus control (p = 0.411). 

Conclusions: Cruciferous vegetable consumption improved postprandial glycaemic control compared with root/squash vegetables. The clinical impact remains uncertain and warrants further investigation, particularly in individuals with impaired glycaemic control. 

Clinical Trial Registry: This trial was registered at www.anzctr.org.au (ACTRN12619001294145).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4300-4310
Number of pages11
JournalDiabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
Volume27
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • cardiovascular disease
  • cruciferous vegetables
  • diabetes
  • glucosinolates
  • glycaemic control
  • postprandial glucose response
  • randomized controlled trial

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cruciferous vegetables improve glycaemic control compared to root/squash vegetables in a randomized, controlled, crossover trial: The VEgetableS for vaScular hEaLth (VESSEL) study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this