Data retention, journalist freedoms and whistleblowers

Sal Humphreys, Melissa de Zwart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As members of the ‘fourth estate’, journalists have enjoyed certain limited protections for themselves and their sources under the laws of various countries. These protections are now uniquely challenged in the context of metadata retention and enhanced surveillance and national security protections. This article examines the recent changes to laws in Australia and the position of journalists as investigative watchdogs. It considers the nature of the new laws, the responses of journalists, the broader context of commercial journalism and the rise of the infotainment business model, and the role of the ‘networked fourth estate’ and non-institutional actors in creating accountable government in Australia.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)103-116
Number of pages14
JournalMedia International Australia
Volume165
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Australian media law
  • investigative journalism
  • metadata
  • metadata retention laws
  • whistleblowers

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Data retention, journalist freedoms and whistleblowers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this