Decolonising the interface between Indigenous peoples and mining companies in Australia: Making space for cultural heritage sites

Jillian Marsh

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    9 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Howitt (2009) claims that state control over mineral and energy resources and developer-Indigenous relations constitute the 'active erasure' of Indigenous knowledge and governance. The cultures and interests of Indigenous players are diverse and at times conflicting during Indigenous-mining interface, and collective bargaining has been shown to substantially weaken these positions, especially in regard to those Indigenous players primarily concerned with the protection of localised heritage. This paper explores a case study from a remote region of South Australia to document this erasure and its implications and to advocate decolonisation of the regulatory interfaces between mining and Indigenous peoples in resource, environmental and heritage governance. It adopts an Indigenous standpoint for research and argues the need for academic research to accept responsibility for some weaknesses in existing systems. The experiences of Adnyamathanha people are used to support an argument that Indigenous empowerment through informed decision-making and a decolonising engagement strategy are yet to be fully realised as key components of an effective interface between Indigenous and commercial players.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)171-184
    Number of pages14
    JournalAsia Pacific Viewpoint
    Volume54
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Decolonising the interface between Indigenous peoples and mining companies in Australia: Making space for cultural heritage sites'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this