Deliberative Agenda Setting: Piloting Reform of Direct Democracy in California

James Fishkin, Thaddeus Kousser, Robert Luskin, Alice Siu

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    15 Citations (Scopus)


    Can the people deliberate to set the agenda for direct democracy in large scale states? How might such an institution work? The 2011 California Deliberative Poll piloted a solution to this problem helping to produce proposals that went to the ballot and also to the legislature. The paper reports on how this pilot worked and what it suggests about a possible institution to solve the deliberative agenda setting problem. The legislative proposal passed the legislature but the ballot proposition (Prop 31) failed. However, we show that the proposals actually deliberated on by the people might well have passed if not encumbered by additional elements not deliberated on by the public that drew opposition. The paper ends with an outline of how the process of deliberative agenda setting for the initiative might work, vetting proposals once every two years that could get on the ballot for a greatly reduced cost in signature collections. Adding deliberation to the agenda setting process would allow for a thoughtful and informed public will formation to determine the agenda for direct democracy.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1030-1042
    Number of pages13
    JournalPerspectives on Politics
    Issue number4
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2015


    Dive into the research topics of 'Deliberative Agenda Setting: Piloting Reform of Direct Democracy in California'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this