Did di do it? Response to a rejoinder

John Guenther; Samuel Osborne

doi:10.1017/jie.2020.19

Did di do it? Response to a rejoinder

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract

Guenther and Osborne's (2020) article 'Did DI do it?' raises concerns about the outcomes of a programme designed to improve literacy for First Nations students in remote schools. A critique of the article challenges the methods and findings. In this response, the authors respond to the criticism.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	173-175
Number of pages	3
Journal	Australian Journal of Indigenous Education
Volume	49
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/jie.2020.19
Publication status	Published - Dec 2020
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Indigenous education
Literacy
Pedagogy
Remote education

Access to Document

10.1017/jie.2020.19Licence: In Copyright

Cite this

@article{ac50f63bc5fa4ff6b73394606f355195,

title = "Did di do it? Response to a rejoinder",

abstract = "Guenther and Osborne's (2020) article 'Did DI do it?' raises concerns about the outcomes of a programme designed to improve literacy for First Nations students in remote schools. A critique of the article challenges the methods and findings. In this response, the authors respond to the criticism.",

keywords = "Indigenous education, Literacy, Pedagogy, Remote education",

author = "John Guenther and Samuel Osborne",

year = "2020",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1017/jie.2020.19",

language = "English",

volume = "49",

pages = "173--175",

journal = "Australian Journal of Indigenous Education",

issn = "1326-0111",

publisher = "Aboriginal and torres Strait Islander Studies Unit",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Did di do it? Response to a rejoinder

AU - Guenther, John

AU - Osborne, Samuel

PY - 2020/12

Y1 - 2020/12

N2 - Guenther and Osborne's (2020) article 'Did DI do it?' raises concerns about the outcomes of a programme designed to improve literacy for First Nations students in remote schools. A critique of the article challenges the methods and findings. In this response, the authors respond to the criticism.

AB - Guenther and Osborne's (2020) article 'Did DI do it?' raises concerns about the outcomes of a programme designed to improve literacy for First Nations students in remote schools. A critique of the article challenges the methods and findings. In this response, the authors respond to the criticism.

KW - Indigenous education

KW - Literacy

KW - Pedagogy

KW - Remote education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092257036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/jie.2020.19

DO - 10.1017/jie.2020.19

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85092257036

SN - 1326-0111

VL - 49

SP - 173

EP - 175

JO - Australian Journal of Indigenous Education

JF - Australian Journal of Indigenous Education

IS - 2

ER -

Did di do it? Response to a rejoinder

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this