Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Dimensions of Authority in Oversight Agencies: American and Australian Comparisons

  • Robin Kempf
  • , Adam Graycar

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Fraud, waste, and abuse damage public administration. Responding involves law enforcement and best practice administration. Many jurisdictions create watchdog agencies to perform this role. A model, which includes seven dimensions of jurisdiction and authority that policymakers should consider when creating an oversight entity, is presented. The model goes beyond the simple functional jurisdiction, i.e., who is overseen and how oversight occurs. Four subnational watchdog agencies in two countries are examined to demonstrate the trade-offs that occur in each dimension when the agencies are designed. This analysis demonstrates there are significant balancing issues at stake, which impact watchdog effectiveness.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1145-1156
    Number of pages12
    JournalInternational Journal of Public Administration
    Volume41
    Issue number14
    Early online date2017
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 30 Jul 2018

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
      SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

    Keywords

    • Agency design
    • Anticorruption
    • Government accountability
    • Oversight

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Dimensions of Authority in Oversight Agencies: American and Australian Comparisons'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this