Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

“Dirty Dagoes” Respond: A Transnational History of a Racial Slur

  • Andonis Piperoglou

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract


During the early twentieth century in the United States and Australia, Italian and Greek migrants were often labelled as “dirty dagoes.” The term “dago” was a derogatory racial slur that situated Italian and Greek migrants as precarious racial inclusions within each nation. Drawing on historical studies on whiteness and migration, this chapter explores the origin, use, and contested meaning of the slur dago, as well as how the use of the term was discussed by Greek and Italian migrants in the pages of popular presses. It will be revealed that the slur dago had a transnational circulation and that its prejudicial connotations mediated how Italian and Greek migrants were racialized and racialized themselves. By transnationalizing the history of dago, this analysis extends the geographical terrain of migrant racialisation in the United States, while also revealing that the routine uses of the slur generated migrant-specific articulations of difference, belonging, and solidarity.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationRedirecting Ethnic Singularity
Subtitle of host publicationItalian Americans and Greek Americans in Conversation
EditorsYiorgos Anagnostou, Yiorgos D. Kalogeras, Theodora Patrona
Place of PublicationNew York
PublisherFordham University Press
Pages23-45
Number of pages23
ISBN (Electronic)9780823299720
ISBN (Print)9781522598664
Publication statusPublished - 2022
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameCritical Studies in Italian America
PublisherFordham University Press

Keywords

  • immigration
  • Greek migrants
  • Italian migrants
  • United States of America
  • lived experience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“Dirty Dagoes” Respond: A Transnational History of a Racial Slur'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this