TY - JOUR
T1 - Disability and support relationships
T2 - What role does policy play?
AU - Fisher, Karen R.
AU - Gendera, Sandra
AU - Graham, Anne
AU - Robinson, Sally
AU - Johnson, Kelley
AU - Neale, Kate
PY - 2019/3
Y1 - 2019/3
N2 - Very little is known about how relationships between people with disabilities and their paid support workers are positioned in policy. With the policy shift toward choice of provider, individualised approaches, person centredness and self-directed funding, the nature of their relationship assumes a more prominent role in the quality of support practice. The policy analysis in this article explores the extent to which current disability policy acknowledges, promotes, or diminishes the relationships between people with disabilities and workers, in their organisational context. It uses Honneth's conditions for recognition—love (cared for), rights (respected) and solidarity or social esteem (valued)—to understand how policy positions mutuality in the relationship. The policy review applied a three-stage process: categorisation of policies, textual analysis and content analysis to policy documents at four levels—international, Australian federal, state and organisational in two case studies. The analysis revealed that while a rights framework is explicit in most policies, the emphases on the conditions for recognition within a relationship between people with disabilities and workers are compromised in instructional policies that attempt to manage the tension between choice and risk, particularly at the organisational level.
AB - Very little is known about how relationships between people with disabilities and their paid support workers are positioned in policy. With the policy shift toward choice of provider, individualised approaches, person centredness and self-directed funding, the nature of their relationship assumes a more prominent role in the quality of support practice. The policy analysis in this article explores the extent to which current disability policy acknowledges, promotes, or diminishes the relationships between people with disabilities and workers, in their organisational context. It uses Honneth's conditions for recognition—love (cared for), rights (respected) and solidarity or social esteem (valued)—to understand how policy positions mutuality in the relationship. The policy review applied a three-stage process: categorisation of policies, textual analysis and content analysis to policy documents at four levels—international, Australian federal, state and organisational in two case studies. The analysis revealed that while a rights framework is explicit in most policies, the emphases on the conditions for recognition within a relationship between people with disabilities and workers are compromised in instructional policies that attempt to manage the tension between choice and risk, particularly at the organisational level.
KW - identity
KW - mutuality
KW - NDIS
KW - paid support workers
KW - people with disability
KW - recognition theory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058636508&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/ARC/LP150100013
U2 - 10.1111/1467-8500.12351
DO - 10.1111/1467-8500.12351
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85058636508
SN - 0313-6647
VL - 78
SP - 37
EP - 55
JO - Australian Journal of Public Administration
JF - Australian Journal of Public Administration
IS - 1
ER -