Disgust memory enhancement extends to more accurate memory but not more false memories

Lucy A. Matson, Ella K. Moeck, Tyla R. Molyneux, Melanie K.T. Takarangi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
17 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

People show enhanced memory recall for disgust over fear, despite both being highly negative and arousing emotions. But does disgust’s ‘stickiness’ in memory result in more false memories for disgust versus fear? Existing research finds low false-memory rates for disgust and fear, perhaps from using image lures depicting content unrelated to target images. Therefore, we presented 111 participants with disgust, fear, (and neutral) images during an attention-monitoring task. After 24–48 hours, participants completed a recognition test, where they viewed ‘old’ (previously seen) and ‘new’ images (both related and unrelated lures) and indicated whether each image was ‘old’ or ‘new’. Relative to fear, participants experienced fewer false memories of disgust for unrelated lures, but similar false memories for related lures. Furthermore, participants’ attention was captured more by disgust than fear images, and correct recognition and memory sensitivity were enhanced for disgust relative to fear. Our findings suggest disgust memory enhancement extends to accurate memory, which has clinical implications.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages13
JournalMemory and Cognition
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 20 Jan 2025

Keywords

  • Disgust
  • False memory
  • Fear
  • Posttraumatic stress
  • Recognition

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Disgust memory enhancement extends to more accurate memory but not more false memories'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this