Disparate Perspectives on Evidence from the Cerutti Mastodon Site: A Reply to Braje et al.

Steven R. Holen, Thomas A. Deméré, Daniel C. Fisher, Richard Fullagar, James B. Paces, George T. Jefferson, Jared M. Beeton, Adam N. Rountrey, Kathleen A. Holen

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Perspective editorial by Braje, T., T. D. Dillehay, J. M. Erlandson, S. M. Fitzpatrick, D. K. Grayson, V. T. Holliday, R. L. Kelly, R. G. Klein, D. J. Meltzer, and T. C. Rick (2017. “Were Hominins in California ∼130,000 Years Ago?” PaleoAmerica 3 (3): 200–202) takes issue with our argument [Holen, S. R., T. A. Deméré, D. C. Fisher, R. Fullagar, J. B. Paces, G. T. Jefferson, J. M. Beeton, et al. (2017. “A 130,000-Year-Old Archaeological Site in Southern California, USA.” Nature 544 (7651): 479–483) that the assemblage of bones and stones at the Cerutti Mastodon (CM) site implicates hominin activity in site formation 130,000 years ago. Braje et al. propose instead that features of the CM site can be better explained by geological or other causes unrelated to ancient human activity. However, we contend that their conclusion reflects an incomplete assessment of our evidence. They further propose a standard of evidence at odds with current practice in the philosophy of science, and misuse a commonly quoted aphorism that “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.”.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)12-15
Number of pages4
JournalPaleoAmerica
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • California
  • Cerutti mastodon site
  • early peopling of the Americas
  • philosophy of science
  • taphonomy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Disparate Perspectives on Evidence from the Cerutti Mastodon Site: A Reply to Braje et al.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this