Abstract
Introduction & Objectives: Active surveillance (AS) is widely accepted as initial management of carefully selected men with low-risk prostate cancer, aiming to reduce overtreatment and its associated side effects. We aimed to compare the outcomes following radical prostatectomy (RP) of AS and non-AS candidates and hypothesised that AS eligibility at diagnosis would be associated with favourable pathological, surgical and also functional outcomes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 51 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | BJU International |
| Volume | 123 |
| Issue number | S2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 10 Apr 2019 |
| Externally published | Yes |
| Event | 2019 Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand Annual Scientific Meeting - Brisbane, Australia Duration: 13 Apr 2019 → 16 Apr 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Prostate cancer
- Radical prostatectomy
- Functional outcomes
- Active surveillance
- South Australia
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Does eligibility for active surveillance of prostate cancer affect functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver