Does emotional closeness to pets motivate their inclusion in bushfire survival plans? Implications for emergency communicators

Joshua Trigg, Bradley Smith, Kirrilly Thompson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As pet ownership influences responses to the threat of bushfire, current preparedness communication acknowledges the pet-owner relationship as a key reason for including pets in emergency plans. However, not all pet-owner relationships are the same. Some people are physically and emotionally 'closer' to their pets than are others, a difference that could impact survival plan intentions. This South Australian study examines how differences in pet-owner closeness affects owners' views of pets as a motivator for plan creation and of pet inclusion in planning across four survivalplan intention types: 'stay and defend', 'split the household', 'wait and decide', and 'leave early'. Of several pet-owner closeness indicators, family membership of pets and anticipated separation distress influenced whether pets were considered a motivator and were included in plans. Intention-specific recommendations for creating motivating communications based on these effects are presented for emergency services communicators.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)24-30
Number of pages7
JournalAustralian Journal of Emergency Management
Volume30
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does emotional closeness to pets motivate their inclusion in bushfire survival plans? Implications for emergency communicators'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this