TY - JOUR
T1 - Does majority support for minority rights impact perceived norms and psychological well-being? An application to the LGBTIQ+ context
AU - Eisner, Léïla
AU - Hässler, Tabea
AU - Thomas, Emma
AU - Lizzio-Wilson, Morgana
AU - McGarty, Craig
AU - Louis, Winnifred
PY - 2025/3/19
Y1 - 2025/3/19
N2 - Several legislative changes following popular votes have transformed the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, intersex, and queer (i.e., LGBTIQ+) people. We suggest these decisions to change laws serve as strong signals of public support (i.e., shifting the perceived societal norms), which may not only impact the well-being of individuals directly targeted by these votes (LGBTIQ+ people) but also members of advantaged groups (cis-heterosexual people) supporting or opposing such changes. Drawing on three preregistered analyses of longitudinal studies following votes in Switzerland (Study 1, 419 LGBTIQ+ people; Study 3, 619 LGBTIQ+ people and 247 cis-heterosexual supporters) and Australia (Study 2, 189 cis-heterosexual supporters and 195 cis-heterosexual opponents), we find that legal changes extending LGBTIQ+ rights led to a positive shift in perceived norms. This positive shift also led to a change in the well-being of LGBTIQ+ people in Study 1 but not in Study 3, suggesting that substantial variation in how people initially perceive the norm may be necessary for such changes to affect well-being. No association was found between perceived norms and well-being among cis-heterosexual people in Studies 2 and 3. Together, these findings suggest that it is critical to focus on the socio-psychological impacts of legal changes on people.
AB - Several legislative changes following popular votes have transformed the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, intersex, and queer (i.e., LGBTIQ+) people. We suggest these decisions to change laws serve as strong signals of public support (i.e., shifting the perceived societal norms), which may not only impact the well-being of individuals directly targeted by these votes (LGBTIQ+ people) but also members of advantaged groups (cis-heterosexual people) supporting or opposing such changes. Drawing on three preregistered analyses of longitudinal studies following votes in Switzerland (Study 1, 419 LGBTIQ+ people; Study 3, 619 LGBTIQ+ people and 247 cis-heterosexual supporters) and Australia (Study 2, 189 cis-heterosexual supporters and 195 cis-heterosexual opponents), we find that legal changes extending LGBTIQ+ rights led to a positive shift in perceived norms. This positive shift also led to a change in the well-being of LGBTIQ+ people in Study 1 but not in Study 3, suggesting that substantial variation in how people initially perceive the norm may be necessary for such changes to affect well-being. No association was found between perceived norms and well-being among cis-heterosexual people in Studies 2 and 3. Together, these findings suggest that it is critical to focus on the socio-psychological impacts of legal changes on people.
KW - LGBTIQ+
KW - longitudinal methodology
KW - norms
KW - political psychology
KW - sexuality/sexual orientation
KW - social change
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105000831003&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/ARC/DP160101618
U2 - 10.1111/pops.70014
DO - 10.1111/pops.70014
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105000831003
SN - 0162-895X
JO - POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY
JF - POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY
ER -