Abstract
A number of screening tools are used to measure function in palliative care. Understanding relationships between different measures has implications for clinical assessments and service provision. The Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Scale (AKPS)1 and the Resource Utilization Group-Activities of Daily Living (RUG-ADL)2 are two scales collected routinely by the Australian national Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration, the world's largest point-of-care symptom and function data collection.3 The AKPS is an 11-point ordinal interval scale (0–100) that measures a person's performance status as it relates to levels of current activity and needs for support.1 The RUG-ADL2 is a four-item ordinal scale, which measures four aspects of physical function—bed mobility, transfers, toileting, and eating. The RUG-ADL tool was developed to measure resource use, which is reflected in its rating system. This study aimed to understand whether the AKPS and RUG-ADL could each aid in the interpretation of the other.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1153-1154 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | Journal of palliative medicine |
Volume | 23 |
Issue number | 9 |
Early online date | 19 Aug 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2020 |
Keywords
- Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Scale (AKPS)
- Resource Utilization Group-Activities of Daily Living (RUG-ADL)
- Australian national Pallia-tive Care Outcomes Collaboration
- palliative care
- Screening tools