Abstract
Recently, I read a reflective piece to the Editor of the Eye on the undergraduate view of ophthalmology teaching in the UK [1]. This was an article that struck a chord with me, especially since I read medicine at the same University as the author. Reading this article, it appears that not much has changed in undergraduate ophthalmology training since I finished my undergraduate medical degree. For me, Ophthalmology was not delivered to the level that would prepare me for clinical practice. This problem has been talked about for decades now [2, 3]. Nevertheless, the issue remains.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1316-1317 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Eye (Basingstoke) |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 1 Aug 2020 |
Keywords
- ophthalmology
- clinical practice
- rural primary health care
- medical education
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Does rural primary care ophthalmology teaching need revisiting?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver