Double trouble: Should double embryo transfer be banned?

Dominic Wilkinson, G Schaefer, Kelton Tremellen, Julian Savulescu

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    What role should legislation or policy play in avoiding the complications of in-vitro fertilization? In this article, we focus on single versus double embryo transfer, and assess three arguments in favour of mandatory single embryo transfer: risks to the mother, risks to resultant children, and costs to society. We highlight significant ethical concerns about each of these. Reproductive autonomy and non-paternalism are strong enough to outweigh the health concerns for the woman. Complications due to non-identity cast doubt on the extent to which children are harmed. Twinning may offer an overall benefit rather than burden to society. Finally, including the future health costs for children (not yet born) in reproductive policy is inconsistent with other decisions. We conclude that mandatory single embryo transfer is not justified and that a number of countries should reconsider their current embryo transfer policy.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)121-139
    Number of pages19
    JournalTheoretical Medicine and Bioethics
    Volume36
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2015

    Keywords

    • Clinical ethics
    • Embryo transfer
    • Ethics
    • In vitro fertilization
    • Multiple pregnancy
    • Twin pregnancy

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Double trouble: Should double embryo transfer be banned?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this