TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of Additional Rehabilitation After Botulinum Toxin-A on Upper Limb Activity in Chronic Stroke
T2 - The InTENSE Trial
AU - Lannin, Natasha A.
AU - Ada, Louise
AU - English, Coralie
AU - Ratcliffe, Julie
AU - Faux, Steven G.
AU - Palit, Mithu
AU - Gonzalez, Senen
AU - Olver, John
AU - Cameron, Ian
AU - Crotty, Maria
AU - InTENSE Trial Group
AU - Bowman, Malcolm
AU - Milte, Rachel
AU - Vratsistas-Curto, Angela
AU - McNamara, Annabel
AU - Shiner, Christine
AU - Lynch, Elizabeth
AU - Schneider, Emma
AU - Beaumont, Louise
AU - Killington, Maggie
AU - Coulter, Megan
AU - Sindhusake, Doungkamol
AU - Anthonisz, Brian
AU - Khor, Hong Mei
AU - Tan, Justin
AU - Teo, Kwong
AU - Ng, Lily
AU - Huang, Lydia
AU - Paul, Maria
AU - Simon, Neil
AU - Gupta, Nidhi
AU - Martens, Rebecca
AU - Bolitho, Sam
AU - Morrison, Shea
AU - Hooper, Sue
AU - Chow, Yan
AU - Watanabe, Yuriko
AU - Cowling, Adrian
AU - Flu, Clara
AU - Edwards, Debbie
AU - Toma, Emily
AU - Hendrey, Genevieve
AU - Sheehan, Jacinta
AU - Butler, Josh
AU - Hocking, Judith
AU - Rutzou, Lauren
AU - White, Megan
AU - Snigg, Michael
AU - Hughes, Rhiannon
AU - Sweeney, Sarah
AU - Flint, Sophie
AU - Levy, Tam
AU - Bramah, Val
AU - Lathlean, Cameron
AU - McCallum, Carrie
AU - Chui, Elaine
AU - Allan, Frances
AU - Webber, Heather
AU - Cameron, Jenna
AU - Campbell, Jo
AU - Lawson, Julie
AU - Zenouith, Kalavani
AU - Borschmann, Karen
AU - Moloney, Katelyn
AU - Jolliffe, Laura
AU - Cameron, Lisa
AU - Howlett, Owen
AU - Nicks, Rebecca
AU - O'Keefe, Sophie
PY - 2020/2
Y1 - 2020/2
N2 - Background and Purpose- The aim of this trial was to determine the effect of additional upper limb rehabilitation following botulinum toxin-A for upper limb activity in chronic stroke. Methods- We conducted a multicenter phase III randomized trial with concealed allocation, blinded measurement, and intention-to-treat analysis. One hundred forty stroke survivors who were scheduled to receive botulinum toxin-A in any muscle(s) that cross the wrist because of moderate to severe spasticity after a stroke >3 months ago, who had completed formal rehabilitation and had no significant cognitive impairment. Experimental group received botulinum toxin-A plus evidence-based movement training while the control group received botulinum toxin-A plus a handout of exercises. Primary outcomes were goal attainment (Goal Attainment Scaling) and upper limb activity (Box and Block Test) at 3 months (end of intervention). Secondary outcomes were spasticity, range of motion, strength, pain, burden of care, and health-related quality of life. Results- In terms of goal attainment, the experimental group scored the same (mean difference, 2 T-score [95% CI, -2 to 7]) as the control group on the Goal Attainment Scale. In terms of upper limb activity, by 3 months the experimental group moved blocks at the same speed (mean difference, 0.00 blocks/s [95% CI, -0.02 to 0.01]) as the control group on the Box and Block Test. There were no differences between groups on any secondary outcome except strength, in favor of the experimental group (mean difference, 1.4 kg [95% CI, 0.2-2.7]). Conclusions- Findings suggest that additional intensive upper limb rehabilitation following botulinum toxin-A in chronic stroke survivors with a disabled upper limb is not effective. Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: ACTRN12615000616572.
AB - Background and Purpose- The aim of this trial was to determine the effect of additional upper limb rehabilitation following botulinum toxin-A for upper limb activity in chronic stroke. Methods- We conducted a multicenter phase III randomized trial with concealed allocation, blinded measurement, and intention-to-treat analysis. One hundred forty stroke survivors who were scheduled to receive botulinum toxin-A in any muscle(s) that cross the wrist because of moderate to severe spasticity after a stroke >3 months ago, who had completed formal rehabilitation and had no significant cognitive impairment. Experimental group received botulinum toxin-A plus evidence-based movement training while the control group received botulinum toxin-A plus a handout of exercises. Primary outcomes were goal attainment (Goal Attainment Scaling) and upper limb activity (Box and Block Test) at 3 months (end of intervention). Secondary outcomes were spasticity, range of motion, strength, pain, burden of care, and health-related quality of life. Results- In terms of goal attainment, the experimental group scored the same (mean difference, 2 T-score [95% CI, -2 to 7]) as the control group on the Goal Attainment Scale. In terms of upper limb activity, by 3 months the experimental group moved blocks at the same speed (mean difference, 0.00 blocks/s [95% CI, -0.02 to 0.01]) as the control group on the Box and Block Test. There were no differences between groups on any secondary outcome except strength, in favor of the experimental group (mean difference, 1.4 kg [95% CI, 0.2-2.7]). Conclusions- Findings suggest that additional intensive upper limb rehabilitation following botulinum toxin-A in chronic stroke survivors with a disabled upper limb is not effective. Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: ACTRN12615000616572.
KW - botulinum toxin type A
KW - neuroscience
KW - pain
KW - quality of life
KW - spasticity
KW - wrist
KW - Botulinum toxin type A
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078563392&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/NHMRC/1079542
U2 - 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027602
DO - 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027602
M3 - Article
C2 - 31813359
SN - 0039-2499
VL - 51
SP - 556
EP - 562
JO - Stroke
JF - Stroke
IS - 2
ER -