Abstract
Introduction: Therapist-delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBTi) is an effective but largely inaccessible treatment for people with co-morbid Insomnia and sleep apnoea (COMISA). To increase CBTi access for COMISA, we aimed to develop a self-guided interactive 5-session digital CBTi program that is appropriate for people with insomnia-alone and COMISA, and compare its effectiveness between people with insomnia-alone, versus comorbid insomnia and high-risk sleep apnoea.
Methods: Data from 62 adults with insomnia symptoms were used. High-risk sleep apnoea was defined as a score of ≥5 on the OSA50. Participants self-reported symptoms of insomnia (ISI), depression, anxiety, sleepiness (ESS), fatigue, and maladaptive sleep-related beliefs (DBAS-16) at baseline, 8-week, and 16-week follow-up. ESS scores were additionally assessed during each CBTi session. Intent-to-treat mixed models and complete-case chi2 analyses were used.
Results: There were more participants with insomnia-alone (n=43, age M[sd]=51.8[17.0], 86.1% female) than suspected COMISA (n=19, age=54.0[14.8], 73.7% female). There were no between-group differences in baseline questionnaire data, or rates of missing follow-up data. There were no significant group by time interactions on any outcomes. Main effects of time indicated moderate-to-large and sustained improvements in insomnia (d=3.3), depression (d=1.2), anxiety (d=0.6), ESS (d=0.5), fatigue (d=1.2), and DBAS-16 symptoms (d=1.2) at 16-weeks. ESS scores did not increase significantly during any CBTi session.
Conclusion: This interactive digital CBTi program is effective in people with insomnia-alone, and people with co-morbid insomnia and high-risk sleep apnoea. Further research is required to determine the effectiveness, safety and acceptability of digital CBTi in people with insomnia and confirmed sleep apnoea.
Methods: Data from 62 adults with insomnia symptoms were used. High-risk sleep apnoea was defined as a score of ≥5 on the OSA50. Participants self-reported symptoms of insomnia (ISI), depression, anxiety, sleepiness (ESS), fatigue, and maladaptive sleep-related beliefs (DBAS-16) at baseline, 8-week, and 16-week follow-up. ESS scores were additionally assessed during each CBTi session. Intent-to-treat mixed models and complete-case chi2 analyses were used.
Results: There were more participants with insomnia-alone (n=43, age M[sd]=51.8[17.0], 86.1% female) than suspected COMISA (n=19, age=54.0[14.8], 73.7% female). There were no between-group differences in baseline questionnaire data, or rates of missing follow-up data. There were no significant group by time interactions on any outcomes. Main effects of time indicated moderate-to-large and sustained improvements in insomnia (d=3.3), depression (d=1.2), anxiety (d=0.6), ESS (d=0.5), fatigue (d=1.2), and DBAS-16 symptoms (d=1.2) at 16-weeks. ESS scores did not increase significantly during any CBTi session.
Conclusion: This interactive digital CBTi program is effective in people with insomnia-alone, and people with co-morbid insomnia and high-risk sleep apnoea. Further research is required to determine the effectiveness, safety and acceptability of digital CBTi in people with insomnia and confirmed sleep apnoea.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 1355468 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Frontiers in Sleep |
Volume | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 13 Mar 2024 |
Keywords
- Difficulties initiating and maintaining sleep
- Non-pharmacological
- Sleep disordered breathing
- Clinical trial
- Insomia