Effects of the end point adjudication process on the results of the perindopril protection against recurrent stroke study (PROGRESS)

Toshiharu Ninomiya,; G Donnan; Neil Anderson; C Bladin; Brian Chambers; Gary Gordon; Norman Sharpe; John Chalmers; Mark Woodward; Bruce Neal

Effects of the end point adjudication process on the results of the perindopril protection against recurrent stroke study (PROGRESS)

Toshiharu Ninomiya,, G Donnan, Neil Anderson, C Bladin, Brian Chambers, Gary Gordon, Norman Sharpe, John Chalmers, Mark Woodward, Bruce Neal

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

26 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	2111-2115
Number of pages	5
Journal	Stroke
Volume	40
Issue number	6
Publication status	Published - 2009

Cite this

@article{8d117446e70844c189da110b0f4223ef,

title = "Effects of the end point adjudication process on the results of the perindopril protection against recurrent stroke study (PROGRESS)",

author = "Toshiharu Ninomiya, and G Donnan and Neil Anderson and C Bladin and Brian Chambers and Gary Gordon and Norman Sharpe and John Chalmers and Mark Woodward and Bruce Neal",

year = "2009",

language = "English",

volume = "40",

pages = "2111--2115",

journal = "Stroke",

issn = "0039-2499",

publisher = "LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of the end point adjudication process on the results of the perindopril protection against recurrent stroke study (PROGRESS)

AU - Ninomiya,, Toshiharu

AU - Donnan, G

AU - Anderson, Neil

AU - Bladin, C

AU - Chambers, Brian

AU - Gordon, Gary

AU - Sharpe, Norman

AU - Chalmers, John

AU - Woodward, Mark

AU - Neal, Bruce

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

M3 - Article

SN - 0039-2499

VL - 40

SP - 2111

EP - 2115

JO - Stroke

JF - Stroke

IS - 6

ER -