TY - JOUR
T1 - Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation
T2 - A randomised controlled trial
AU - Bullen, Christopher
AU - Howe, Colin
AU - Laugesen, Murray
AU - McRobbie, Hayden
AU - Parag, Varsha
AU - Williman, Jonathan
AU - Walker, Natalie
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Background Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) can deliver nicotine and mitigate tobacco withdrawal and are used by many smokers to assist quit attempts. We investigated whether e-cigarettes are more eff ective than nicotine patches at helping smokers to quit. Methods We did this pragmatic randomised-controlled superiority trial in Auckland, New Zealand, between Sept 6, 2011, and July 5, 2013. Adult (≥18 years) smokers wanting to quit were randomised (with computerised block randomisation, block size nine, stratifi ed by ethnicity [Māori; Pacifi c; or non-Māori, non-Pacifi c], sex [men or women], and level of nicotine dependence [>5 or ≤5 Fagerström test for nicotine dependence]) in a 4:4:1 ratio to 16 mg nicotine e-cigarettes, nicotine patches (21 mg patch, one daily), or placebo e-cigarettes (no nicotine), from 1 week before until 12 weeks after quit day, with low intensity behavioural support via voluntary telephone counselling. The primary outcome was biochemically verifi ed continuous abstinence at 6 months (exhaled breath carbon monoxide measurement <10 ppm). Primary analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12610000866000. Findings 657 people were randomised (289 to nicotine e-cigarettes, 295 to patches, and 73 to placebo e-cigarettes) and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. At 6 months, verifi ed abstinence was 7·3% (21 of 289) with nicotine e-cigarettes, 5·8% (17 of 295) with patches, and 4·1% (three of 73) with placebo e-cigarettes (risk diff erence for nicotine e-cigarette vs patches 1·51 [95% CI-2·49 to 5·51]; for nicotine e-cigarettes vs placebo e-cigarettes 3·16 [95% CI-2·29 to 8·61]). Achievement of abstinence was substantially lower than we anticipated for the power calculation, thus we had insuffi cient statistical power to conclude superiority of nicotine e-cigarettes to patches or to placebo e-cigarettes. We identifi ed no signifi cant diff erences in adverse events, with 137 events in the nicotine e-cigarettes group, 119 events in the patches group, and 36 events in the placebo e-cigarettes group. We noted no evidence of an association between adverse events and study product. Interpretation E-cigarettes, with or without nicotine, were modestly eff ective at helping smokers to quit, with similar achievement of abstinence as with nicotine patches, and few adverse events. Uncertainty exists about the place of e-cigarettes in tobacco control, and more research is urgently needed to clearly establish their overall benefi ts and harms at both individual and population levels. Funding Health Research Council of New Zealand.
AB - Background Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) can deliver nicotine and mitigate tobacco withdrawal and are used by many smokers to assist quit attempts. We investigated whether e-cigarettes are more eff ective than nicotine patches at helping smokers to quit. Methods We did this pragmatic randomised-controlled superiority trial in Auckland, New Zealand, between Sept 6, 2011, and July 5, 2013. Adult (≥18 years) smokers wanting to quit were randomised (with computerised block randomisation, block size nine, stratifi ed by ethnicity [Māori; Pacifi c; or non-Māori, non-Pacifi c], sex [men or women], and level of nicotine dependence [>5 or ≤5 Fagerström test for nicotine dependence]) in a 4:4:1 ratio to 16 mg nicotine e-cigarettes, nicotine patches (21 mg patch, one daily), or placebo e-cigarettes (no nicotine), from 1 week before until 12 weeks after quit day, with low intensity behavioural support via voluntary telephone counselling. The primary outcome was biochemically verifi ed continuous abstinence at 6 months (exhaled breath carbon monoxide measurement <10 ppm). Primary analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12610000866000. Findings 657 people were randomised (289 to nicotine e-cigarettes, 295 to patches, and 73 to placebo e-cigarettes) and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. At 6 months, verifi ed abstinence was 7·3% (21 of 289) with nicotine e-cigarettes, 5·8% (17 of 295) with patches, and 4·1% (three of 73) with placebo e-cigarettes (risk diff erence for nicotine e-cigarette vs patches 1·51 [95% CI-2·49 to 5·51]; for nicotine e-cigarettes vs placebo e-cigarettes 3·16 [95% CI-2·29 to 8·61]). Achievement of abstinence was substantially lower than we anticipated for the power calculation, thus we had insuffi cient statistical power to conclude superiority of nicotine e-cigarettes to patches or to placebo e-cigarettes. We identifi ed no signifi cant diff erences in adverse events, with 137 events in the nicotine e-cigarettes group, 119 events in the patches group, and 36 events in the placebo e-cigarettes group. We noted no evidence of an association between adverse events and study product. Interpretation E-cigarettes, with or without nicotine, were modestly eff ective at helping smokers to quit, with similar achievement of abstinence as with nicotine patches, and few adverse events. Uncertainty exists about the place of e-cigarettes in tobacco control, and more research is urgently needed to clearly establish their overall benefi ts and harms at both individual and population levels. Funding Health Research Council of New Zealand.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887680599&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61842-5
DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61842-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 24029165
AN - SCOPUS:84887680599
SN - 0140-6736
VL - 382
SP - 1629
EP - 1637
JO - The Lancet
JF - The Lancet
IS - 9905
ER -