Emergent research and priorities for shark and ray conservation

Salvador J. Jorgensen, Fiorenza Micheli, Timothy D. White, Kyle S. Van Houtan, Joanna Alfaro-Shigueto, Samantha Andrzejaczek, Natalie S. Arnoldi, Julia K. Baum, Barbara Block, Gregory L. Britten, Cheryl Butner, Susana Caballero, Diego Cardeñosa, Taylor K. Chapple, Shelley Clarke, Enric Cortés, Nicholas K. Dulvy, Sarah Fowler, Austin J. Gallagher, Eric GilmanBrendan J. Godley, Rachel T. Graham, Neil Hammerschlag, Alastair V. Harry, Michael R. Heithaus, Melanie Hutchinson, Charlie Huveneers, Chris G. Lowe, Luis O. Lucifora, Tracy MacKeracher, Jeffrey C. Mangel, Ana Paula Barbosa Martins, Douglas J. McCauley, Loren McClenachan, Christopher Mull, Lisa J. Natanson, Daniel Pauly, Diana A. Pazmino, Jennifer C. A. Pistevos, Nuno Queiroz, George Roff, Brendan D. Shea, Colin A. Simpfendorfer, David W Sims, Christine Ward-Paige, Boris Worm, Francesco Ferretti

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Over the past 4 decades there has been a growing concern for the conservation status of elasmobranchs (sharks and rays). In 2002, the first elasmobranch species were added to Appendix II of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). Less than 20 yr later, there were 39 species on Appendix II and 5 on Appendix I. Despite growing concern, effective conservation and management remain challenged by a lack of data on population status for many species, human-wildlife interactions, threats to population viability, and the efficacy of conservation approaches. We surveyed 100 of the most frequently published and cited experts on elasmobranchs and, based on ranked responses, prioritized 20 research questions on elasmobranch conservation. To address these questions, we then convened a group of 47 experts from 35 institutions and 12 countries. The 20 questions were organized into the following broad categories: (1) status and threats, (2) population and ecology, and (3) conservation and management. For each section, we sought to synthesize existing knowledge, describe consensus or diverging views, identify gaps, and suggest promising future directions and research priorities. The resulting synthesis aggregates an array of perspectives on emergent research and priority directions for elasmobranch conservation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171-203
Number of pages33
JournalEndangered Species Research
Volume47
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Feb 2022

Keywords

  • Elasmobranch
  • Conservation priorities
  • Sharks
  • Rays

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Emergent research and priorities for shark and ray conservation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this