TY - JOUR
T1 - EMG-informed neuromusculoskeletal models accurately predict knee loading measured using instrumented implants
AU - Bennett, Kieran James
AU - Pizzolato, Claudio
AU - Martelli, Saulo
AU - Bahl, Jasvir S.
AU - Sivakumar, Arjun
AU - Atkins, Gerald J.
AU - Solomon, Lucian Bogdan
AU - Thewlis, Dominic
PY - 2022/7/1
Y1 - 2022/7/1
N2 - Objective: Using a musculoskeletal modelling framework, we aimed to (1) estimate knee joint loading using static optimization (SO); (2) explore different calibration functions in electromyogram (EMG)-informed models used in estimating knee load; and (3) determine, when using an EMG-informed stochastic method, if the measured joint loadings are solutions to the muscle redundancy problem when investigating only the uncertainty in muscle forces. Methods: Musculoskeletal models for three individuals with instrumented knee replacements were generated. Muscle forces were calculated using SO, EMG-informed, and EMG-informed stochastic methods. Measured knee joint loads from the prostheses were compared to the SO and EMG-informed solutions. Root mean square error (RMSE) in joint load estimation was calculated, and the muscle force ranges were compared. Results: The RMSE ranged between 192-674 N, 152-487 N, and 7-108 N for the SO, the calibrated EMG-informed solution, and the best fit stochastic result, respectively. The stochastic method produced solution spaces encompassing the measured joint loading up to 98% of stance. Conclusion: Uncertainty in muscle forces can account for total knee loading and it is recommended that, where possible, EMG measurements should be included to estimate knee joint loading. Significance: This work shows that the inclusion of EMG-informed modelling allows for better estimation of knee joint loading when compared to SO.
AB - Objective: Using a musculoskeletal modelling framework, we aimed to (1) estimate knee joint loading using static optimization (SO); (2) explore different calibration functions in electromyogram (EMG)-informed models used in estimating knee load; and (3) determine, when using an EMG-informed stochastic method, if the measured joint loadings are solutions to the muscle redundancy problem when investigating only the uncertainty in muscle forces. Methods: Musculoskeletal models for three individuals with instrumented knee replacements were generated. Muscle forces were calculated using SO, EMG-informed, and EMG-informed stochastic methods. Measured knee joint loads from the prostheses were compared to the SO and EMG-informed solutions. Root mean square error (RMSE) in joint load estimation was calculated, and the muscle force ranges were compared. Results: The RMSE ranged between 192-674 N, 152-487 N, and 7-108 N for the SO, the calibrated EMG-informed solution, and the best fit stochastic result, respectively. The stochastic method produced solution spaces encompassing the measured joint loading up to 98% of stance. Conclusion: Uncertainty in muscle forces can account for total knee loading and it is recommended that, where possible, EMG measurements should be included to estimate knee joint loading. Significance: This work shows that the inclusion of EMG-informed modelling allows for better estimation of knee joint loading when compared to SO.
KW - Biological system modeling
KW - Biomechanical simulation
KW - Biomechanics
KW - Electromyography
KW - electromyography
KW - Knee
KW - Load modeling
KW - Loading
KW - Muscles
KW - neuromusculoskeletal models
KW - Stochastic processes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122560341&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/ARC/DP180103146
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/ARC/FT180100338
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/ARC/IC190100020
U2 - 10.1109/TBME.2022.3141067
DO - 10.1109/TBME.2022.3141067
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85122560341
SN - 0018-9294
VL - 69
SP - 2268
EP - 2275
JO - IEEE Transactions On Biomedical Engineering
JF - IEEE Transactions On Biomedical Engineering
IS - 7
ER -