Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone for stroke

  • Joseph Broderick
  • , Yuko Palesch
  • , Andrew Demchuk
  • , Sharon Yeatts
  • , Pooja Khatri
  • , Michael Hill
  • , Edward Jauch
  • , Tudor Jovin
  • , B Yan
  • , Frank Silver
  • , Rudiger Von Kummer
  • , Carlos Molina
  • , Bart Demaerschalk
  • , Ronald Budzik
  • , Wayne Clark
  • , Osama Zaidat
  • , Timothy Malisch
  • , Mayank Goyal
  • , Wouter Schonewille
  • , Mikael Mazighi
  • Stefan Engelter, Craig Anderson, Judith Spilker, Janice Carrozzella, Karla Ryckborst, L Janis, Renee Martin, Lydia Foster, Thomas Tomsick

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

    1650 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND: Endovascular therapy is increasingly used after the administration of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) for patients with moderate-to-severe acute ischemic stroke, but whether a combined approach is more effective than intravenous t-PA alone is uncertain. METHODS: We randomly assigned eligible patients who had received intravenous t-PA within 3 hours after symptom onset to receive additional endovascular therapy or intravenous t-PA alone, in a 2:1 ratio. The primary outcome measure was a modified Rankin scale score of 2 or less (indicating functional independence) at 90 days (scores range from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability). RESULTS: The study was stopped early because of futility after 656 participants had undergone randomization (434 patients to endovascular therapy and 222 to intravenous t-PA alone). The proportion of participants with a modified Rankin score of 2 or less at 90 days did not differ significantly according to treatment (40.8% with endovascular therapy and 38.7% with intravenous t-PA; absolute adjusted difference, 1.5 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -6.1 to 9.1, with adjustment for the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score [8-19, indicating moderately severe stroke, or ≥20, indicating severe stroke]), nor were there significant differences for the predefined subgroups of patients with an NIHSS score of 20 or higher (6.8 percentage points; 95% CI, -4.4 to 18.1) and those with a score of 19 or lower (-1.0 percentage point; 95% CI, -10.8 to 8.8). Findings in the endovascular-therapy and intravenous t-PA groups were similar for mortality at 90 days (19.1% and 21.6%, respectively; P = 0.52) and the proportion of patients with symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage within 30 hours after initiation of t-PA (6.2% and 5.9%, respectively; P = 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: The trial showed similar safety outcomes and no significant difference in functional independence with endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA, as compared with intravenous t-PA alone. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00359424.)

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)893-903
    Number of pages11
    JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
    Volume368
    Issue number10
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 7 Mar 2013

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone for stroke'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this