TY - JOUR
T1 - Energy System Contributions in Upper and Lower Body Wingate Tests in Highly Trained Athletes
AU - Julio, Ursula F.
AU - Panissa, Valéria L.G.
AU - Cury, Rubiana L.
AU - Agostinho, Marcus F.
AU - Esteves, João V.D.C.
AU - Franchini, Emerson
PY - 2019/4/3
Y1 - 2019/4/3
N2 - Purpose: This study compared the energy system contributions and relationship between mechanical and energy system variables in upper and lower body Wingate tests (WAnT) in judo athletes. Method: Eleven male judo athletes (18 ± 1 years, 174.3 ± 5.3 cm, 72.6 ± 9.9 kg, 11.8 ± 1.7% body fat) attended two laboratory sessions to perform two WAnT (upper and lower body) and two incremental tests (upper and lower body). The energy contributions of the oxidative, glycolytic, and phosphagen (ATP-PCr) systems were estimated based on oxygen consumption ((Formula presented.)) during WAnT, delta of lactate, and the fast phase of excess (Formula presented.), respectively. Results: The upper and lower body presented similar results of oxidative (21 ± 4% vs 23 ± 3%) and ATP-PCr system contributions (29 ± 6% vs 32 ± 5%). The glycolytic system contribution (50 ± 5% vs 45 ± 4%) was higher in the upper body. The variance of mechanical variables in upper body was explained by glycolytic (R2 = 0.49–0.62) and oxidative systems (R2 = 0.44–0.49), whereas the variance of mechanical variables in lower body was explained by ATP-PCr (R2 = 0.41–0.55) and glycolytic systems (R2 = 0.62–0.94). Conclusions: During WAnT, the glycolytic system presented the major energy contribution, being higher in the upper body. Moreover, mechanical and energy system variables presented a distinct relationship when comparing upper and lower body WAnT.
AB - Purpose: This study compared the energy system contributions and relationship between mechanical and energy system variables in upper and lower body Wingate tests (WAnT) in judo athletes. Method: Eleven male judo athletes (18 ± 1 years, 174.3 ± 5.3 cm, 72.6 ± 9.9 kg, 11.8 ± 1.7% body fat) attended two laboratory sessions to perform two WAnT (upper and lower body) and two incremental tests (upper and lower body). The energy contributions of the oxidative, glycolytic, and phosphagen (ATP-PCr) systems were estimated based on oxygen consumption ((Formula presented.)) during WAnT, delta of lactate, and the fast phase of excess (Formula presented.), respectively. Results: The upper and lower body presented similar results of oxidative (21 ± 4% vs 23 ± 3%) and ATP-PCr system contributions (29 ± 6% vs 32 ± 5%). The glycolytic system contribution (50 ± 5% vs 45 ± 4%) was higher in the upper body. The variance of mechanical variables in upper body was explained by glycolytic (R2 = 0.49–0.62) and oxidative systems (R2 = 0.44–0.49), whereas the variance of mechanical variables in lower body was explained by ATP-PCr (R2 = 0.41–0.55) and glycolytic systems (R2 = 0.62–0.94). Conclusions: During WAnT, the glycolytic system presented the major energy contribution, being higher in the upper body. Moreover, mechanical and energy system variables presented a distinct relationship when comparing upper and lower body WAnT.
KW - anaerobic fitness
KW - Anaerobic power reserve
KW - energy expenditure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063596401&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02701367.2019.1576839
DO - 10.1080/02701367.2019.1576839
M3 - Article
C2 - 30908121
AN - SCOPUS:85063596401
SN - 0270-1367
VL - 90
SP - 244
EP - 250
JO - RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT
JF - RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT
IS - 2
ER -