Erratum: A complex intervention to improve pregnancy outcome in obese women: the UPBEAT randomised controlled trial

Annette L. Briley, Suzanne Barr, Shirlene Badger, Ruth Bell, Helen Croker, Keith M. Godfrey, Bridget Holmes, Tarja I. Kinnunen, Scott M. Nelson, Eugene Oteng-Ntim, Nashita Patel, Stephen C. Robson, Jane Sandall, Thomas Sanders, Naveed Sattar, Paul T. Seed, Jane Wardle, Lucilla Poston

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

After publication of the original article [1] it came to the publishers attention that pre-existing diabetes had been omitted from the exclusion criteria in the manuscript. The paragraph on page 4 should read: Exclusion criteria Women unable or unwilling to give informed consent; <15 + 0 weeks or >18 + 6 weeks’ gestation; essential hypertension requiring treatment either pre-pregnancy or in index pregnancy; pre-existing diabetes (Type 1 or Type 2); pre-existing renal disease; systemic lupus erythematosus; antiphospholipid syndrome; sickle cell disease; thalassemia; coeliac disease; thyroid disease; current psychosis; multiple pregnancy; currently prescribed metformin. We apologize for any inconvenience this has caused.
Original languageEnglish
Article number111
Number of pages1
JournalBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Volume15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 May 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Erratum
  • Study protocol
  • Pregnancy
  • Obesity
  • Complex intervention
  • Gestational diabetes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: A complex intervention to improve pregnancy outcome in obese women: the UPBEAT randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this