TY - JOUR
T1 - Erratum
T2 - Is inhaled prophylactic heparin useful for prevention and management of pneumonia in ventilated ICU patients?
AU - The IPHIVAP investigators of the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group
AU - Bandeshe, Hiran
AU - Boots, Rob
AU - Dulhunty, Joel
AU - Dunlop, Rachael
AU - Holley, Anthony
AU - Jarrett, Paul
AU - Gomersall, Charles D.
AU - Lipman, Jeff
AU - Lo, Thomas
AU - O'Donoghue, Steven
AU - Paratz, Jenny
AU - Paterson, David
AU - Roberts, Jason A.
AU - Starr, Therese
AU - Stephens, Di
AU - Stuart, Janine
AU - Thomas, Jane
AU - Udy, Andrew
AU - White, Hayden
PY - 2016/10
Y1 - 2016/10
N2 - Purpose The purpose was to determine the efficacy of prophylactic inhaled heparin for the prevention and treatment of pneumonia in patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV). Methods A phase 2, double-blind, randomized controlled trial stratified for study center and patient type (nonoperative, postoperative) was conducted in 3 university-affiliated intensive care units. Patients aged at least 18 years and requiring invasive MV for more than 48 hours were randomized to usual care, nebulization of unfractionated sodium heparin (5000 U in 2 mL), or nebulization with 0.9% sodium chloride (2 mL) 4 times daily with the main outcome measures, the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), ventilator-associated complication, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores in patients with admission pneumonia or developing VAP. Trial registration: ACTRN12612000038897. Results A total of 214 patients were enrolled (72 usual care, 71 inhaled sodium heparin, 71 inhaled sodium chloride). There were no differences between treatment groups in terms of the development of VAP using either Klompas criteria (6%-7%, P = 1.00) or clinical diagnosis (24%-26%, P = .85). Conclusion Low-dose nebulized heparin cannot be recommended for prophylaxis against VAP or to hasten recovery from pneumonia in patients receiving MV.
AB - Purpose The purpose was to determine the efficacy of prophylactic inhaled heparin for the prevention and treatment of pneumonia in patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV). Methods A phase 2, double-blind, randomized controlled trial stratified for study center and patient type (nonoperative, postoperative) was conducted in 3 university-affiliated intensive care units. Patients aged at least 18 years and requiring invasive MV for more than 48 hours were randomized to usual care, nebulization of unfractionated sodium heparin (5000 U in 2 mL), or nebulization with 0.9% sodium chloride (2 mL) 4 times daily with the main outcome measures, the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), ventilator-associated complication, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores in patients with admission pneumonia or developing VAP. Trial registration: ACTRN12612000038897. Results A total of 214 patients were enrolled (72 usual care, 71 inhaled sodium heparin, 71 inhaled sodium chloride). There were no differences between treatment groups in terms of the development of VAP using either Klompas criteria (6%-7%, P = 1.00) or clinical diagnosis (24%-26%, P = .85). Conclusion Low-dose nebulized heparin cannot be recommended for prophylaxis against VAP or to hasten recovery from pneumonia in patients receiving MV.
KW - Nebulization
KW - Unfractionated heparin
KW - Ventilator-associated complication
KW - Ventilator-associated pneumonia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994759746&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.06.022
DO - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.06.022
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84994759746
SN - 0883-9441
VL - 35
SP - 231
EP - 239
JO - Journal of Critical Care
JF - Journal of Critical Care
ER -