Establishing a Core Outcome Measure for Graft Health: A Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Kidney Transplantation (SONG-Tx) Consensus Workshop Report

Allison Tong, Bénédicte Sautenet, Emilio D. Poggio, Krista L. Lentine, Rainer Oberbauer, Roslyn B. Mannon, Barbara T. Murphy, Benita S. Padilla, Kaiming Chow, Lorna Palmer Marson, Steven James Chadban, Jonathan C. Craig, Angela Ju, Karine E. Manera, Camilla S. Hanson, Michelle A. Josephson, Greg A. Knoll

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)


Background: Graft loss, a critically important outcome for transplant recipients, is variably defined and measured, and incompletely reported in trials. We convened a consensus workshop on establishing a core outcome measure for graft loss for all trials in kidney transplantation.

Methods: Twenty-five kidney transplant recipients/caregivers and 33 health professionals from 8 countries participated. Transcripts were analyzed thematically.

Results: Five themes were identified. “Graft loss as a continuum” conceptualizes graft loss as a process, but requiring an endpoint defined as a discrete event. In “defining an event with precision and accuracy,” loss of graft function requiring chronic dialysis (minimum, 90 days) provided an objective and practical definition; retransplant would capture preemptive transplantation; relisting was readily measured but would overestimate graft loss; and allograft nephrectomy was redundant in being preceded by dialysis. However, the thresholds for renal replacement therapy varied. Conservative management was regarded as too ambiguous and complex to use routinely. “Distinguishing death-censored graft loss” would ensure clarity and meaningfulness in interpreting results. “Consistent reporting for decision making” by specifying time points and metrics (ie time to event) was suggested. “Ease of ascertainment and data collection” of the outcome from registries could support use of registry data to efficiently extend follow-up of trial participants.

Conclusions: A practical and meaningful core outcome measure for graft loss may be defined as chronic dialysis or retransplant, and distinguished from loss due to death. Consistent reporting of graft loss using standardized metrics and time points may improve the contribution of trials to decision making in kidney transplantation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1358-1366
Number of pages9
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2018
Externally publishedYes


  • graft loss
  • graft health
  • Nephrology-Kidney Transplantation
  • Outcomes


Dive into the research topics of 'Establishing a Core Outcome Measure for Graft Health: A Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Kidney Transplantation (SONG-Tx) Consensus Workshop Report'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this