Evaluating the impact of community-based treatment options on methamphetamine use: Findings from the Methamphetamine Treatment Evaluation Study (MATES)

Rebecca McKetin, Jake Najman, Amanda Baker, Dan Lubman, Sharon Dawe, Robert Ali, Nicole Lee, Richard Mattick, Abdullah Mamun

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    75 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Aims: To evaluate the impact of community-based drug treatment on methamphetamine use using inverse probability of treatment-weighted (IPTW) estimators to derive treatment effects. Design: A longitudinal prospective cohort study with follow-ups at 3 months, 1 year and 3 years. Treatment effects were derived by comparing groups at follow-up. IPTW estimators were used to adjust for pre-treatment differences between groups. Setting: Sydney and Brisbane, Australia. Participants: Participants were methamphetamine users entering community-based detoxification (n=112) or residential rehabilitation (n=248) services and a quasi-control group of methamphetamine users (n=101) recruited from the community. Measurements: Frequency of methamphetamine use between interviews (no use, less than weekly, 1-2 days per week, 3+ days per week), continuous abstinence from methamphetamine use, past month methamphetamine use and methamphetamine dependence. Findings: Detoxification did not reduce methamphetamine use at any follow-up relative to the quasi-control group. Relative to quasi-control and detoxification groups combined, residential rehabilitation produced large reductions in the frequency of methamphetamine use at 3 months [odds ratio (OR)=0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15-0.36, P<0.001), with a marked attenuation of this effect at 1 year (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.40-0.97, P=0.038) and 3 years (OR=0.71, 95% CI 0.42-1.19, P=0.189). The greatest impact was for abstinence: for every 100 residential rehabilitation clients there was a gain of 33 being continuously abstinent at 3 months, with this falling to 14 at 1 year and 6 at 3 years. Conclusions: Community-based residential rehabilitation may produce a time-limited decrease in methamphetamine use, while detoxification alone does not appear to do so.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1998-2008
    Number of pages11
    JournalAddiction
    Volume107
    Issue number11
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2012

    Keywords

    • Amphetamine
    • Crime
    • HIV risk
    • Longitudinal
    • Methamphetamine
    • Outcomes
    • Psychiatric comorbidity
    • Substance abuse
    • Treatment

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating the impact of community-based treatment options on methamphetamine use: Findings from the Methamphetamine Treatment Evaluation Study (MATES)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this