Evaluation outcomes of a knowledge translation platform: A structure for support and exchange in prevention

Tahna Lee Pettman, Rebecca Armstrong, Shae Johnson, Penelope Love, Timothy Gill, John Coveney, Boyd Swinburn, Steven Allender

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Obesity prevention is an urgent public health priority that requires action at multiple levels. Collaboration between academics, policy and practice is necessary to ensure best-practice implementation. A national knowledge translation and exchange (KT) platform, the Collaboration of Community-based Obesity Prevention Sites (CO-OPS), was delivered and evaluated over three
years (2013–15). A mixed-methods evaluation used communications and website data, knowledge brokering data, event evaluations, interviews and tracer searches to assess process (reach, delivery, quality, cost, uptake) and impact (use of tools/resources, networking, improvements in practice).
Results included: 1) average 27% yearly membership growth (330 new members per year) in response to KT activities including tailored communications, stakeholder engagement, knowledge brokering and networking opportunities; 2) sustained website use with approximately 1200 visits/month and 73% unique visitors; and high access to networking and professional development information (120 hits/month), and best practice guidelines (60 hits/month);
3) higher uptake of face-to-face interactive strategies (for example, workshops) than online interactive strategies (for example, knowledge broker service) and higher uptake of passive KT (for example, website resources) than interactive KT strategies (for example, workshops); 4) the KT function of CO-OPS was clearly valued, and appeared to address a gap in implementation. A central coordinating KT platform provided support for best practice and exchange opportunities to a broad network of practice, policy and academic professionals. Simple KT strategies such as tailored, targeted online resources were useful for practice, whilst more intensive KT strategies were important for network engagement. Findings are applicable to other information-sharing networks where professionals address complex public health problems.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)99-121
Number of pages23
JournalEvidence & Policy
Volume16
Issue number1
Early online date18 May 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2020

Keywords

  • Evidence-informed practice
  • Exchange
  • Knowledge translation
  • Networks

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation outcomes of a knowledge translation platform: A structure for support and exchange in prevention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this