Examining the additivity of peak heights in forensic DNA profiles

Kevin Cheng, Jo Anne Bright, Zane Kerr, Duncan Taylor, Anne Ciecko, James Curran, John Buckleton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)


It is routinely assumed when interpreting forensic DNA profiles that peaks of the same molecular size, whether allelic or stutter in origin, ‘stack’. That is, the height of a composite peak is approximately equal to the sum of its parts. There is strong theoretical reason to believe that this assumption should hold across the range of peak heights where fluorescent response is linear with respect to template. However, recent publications have called for empirical proof of, or directly questioned, this assumption. In this study we have examined the heights of allelic, stutter, and composite peaks, and demonstrate that peak heights are reliably predicted as the sum of their individual components. This work supports the long-held belief that peak heights ‘stack’ in an additive fashion.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages16
JournalAustralian Journal of Forensic Sciences
Early online date7 Jan 2020
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 7 Jan 2020


  • allele
  • DNA profile interpretation
  • mixtures
  • stacking
  • stutter


Dive into the research topics of 'Examining the additivity of peak heights in forensic DNA profiles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this