TY - JOUR
T1 - Expert consensus and recommendations on safety criteria for active mobilization of mechanically ventilated critically ill adults
AU - Hodgson, Carol
AU - Stiller, Kathy
AU - Needham, Dale
AU - Tipping, Claire
AU - Harrold, Megan
AU - Baldwin, Claire
AU - Bradley, Scott
AU - Berney, Sue
AU - Caruana, Lawrence
AU - Elliott, Doug
AU - Green, Margot
AU - Haines, Kimberly
AU - Higgins, Alisa
AU - Kaukonen, Kirsi-Maija
AU - Leditschke, Isabel
AU - Nickels, Marc
AU - Paratz, Jennifer
AU - Patman, Shane
AU - Skinner, Elizabeth
AU - Young, Paul
AU - Zanni, Jennifer
AU - Denehy, Linda
AU - Webb, Steven
PY - 2014/12/4
Y1 - 2014/12/4
N2 - Introduction: The aim of this study was to develop consensus recommendations on safety parameters for mobilizing adult, mechanically ventilated, intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Methods: A systematic literature review was followed by a meeting of 23 multidisciplinary ICU experts to seek consensus regarding the safe mobilization of mechanically ventilated patients. Results: Safety considerations were summarized in four categories: respiratory, cardiovascular, neurological and other. Consensus was achieved on all criteria for safe mobilization, with the exception being levels of vasoactive agents. Intubation via an endotracheal tube was not a contraindication to early mobilization and a fraction of inspired oxygen less than 0.6 with a percutaneous oxygen saturation more than 90% and a respiratory rate less than 30 breaths/minute were considered safe criteria for in- and out-of-bed mobilization if there were no other contraindications. At an international meeting, 94 multidisciplinary ICU clinicians concurred with the proposed recommendations. Conclusion: Consensus recommendations regarding safety criteria for mobilization of adult, mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU have the potential to guide ICU rehabilitation whilst minimizing the risk of adverse events.
AB - Introduction: The aim of this study was to develop consensus recommendations on safety parameters for mobilizing adult, mechanically ventilated, intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Methods: A systematic literature review was followed by a meeting of 23 multidisciplinary ICU experts to seek consensus regarding the safe mobilization of mechanically ventilated patients. Results: Safety considerations were summarized in four categories: respiratory, cardiovascular, neurological and other. Consensus was achieved on all criteria for safe mobilization, with the exception being levels of vasoactive agents. Intubation via an endotracheal tube was not a contraindication to early mobilization and a fraction of inspired oxygen less than 0.6 with a percutaneous oxygen saturation more than 90% and a respiratory rate less than 30 breaths/minute were considered safe criteria for in- and out-of-bed mobilization if there were no other contraindications. At an international meeting, 94 multidisciplinary ICU clinicians concurred with the proposed recommendations. Conclusion: Consensus recommendations regarding safety criteria for mobilization of adult, mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU have the potential to guide ICU rehabilitation whilst minimizing the risk of adverse events.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927722146&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13054-014-0658-y
DO - 10.1186/s13054-014-0658-y
M3 - Article
SN - 1364-8535
VL - 18
JO - Critical Care
JF - Critical Care
IS - 6
M1 - 658
ER -