Explaining memory amplification: Is it all about the test format?

Melanie Takarangi, Jacinta Oulton, Deryn Strange

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Trauma-exposed people commonly exhibit a “memory amplification” effect, endorsing exposure to more traumatic events over time. Studies reporting this phenomenon have typically relied on checklists, where participants read event descriptions and indicate (yes/no) their exposure. We examined whether that approach is vulnerable to response biases and memory errors. In two experiments, participants viewed negative photos and completed an Old-New recognition test. In Experiment 1, participants completed either a photo recognition test or description test—composed of written descriptions of negative photos. In Experiment 2, we measured analogue PTSD symptoms and participants completed the description test twice, 24 hr apart. Those in the description test condition performed worse on the memory test and were more biased to endorse negative photos compared with the photo test condition. Furthermore, this bias to endorse negative photos increased over time and was related to analogue PTSD symptoms. Overall, our findings suggest that test format plays a role in memory amplification.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)394-406
Number of pages13
JournalClinical Psychological Science
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2018

Keywords

  • trauma
  • response bias
  • posttraumatic stress disorder
  • memory

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Explaining memory amplification: Is it all about the test format?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this