TY - JOUR
T1 - Exploring the contribution of animal companionship to human wellbeing
T2 - A three-country study
AU - Riggs, Damien W.
AU - Taylor, Nik
AU - Fraser, Heather
AU - Peel, Elizabeth
PY - 2024/1/31
Y1 - 2024/1/31
N2 - While it is often assumed that animal companions unilaterally contribute to the wellbeing of their human companions, research has to date been equivocal. At best it appears to be that animal companionship may add an extra dimension to human lives, and thus human wellbeing. In this paper we report on a quantitative study conducted in 2021 that surveyed 2090 people with animal companions living in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Participants responded to measures asking about their wellbeing and psychological distress, their connectedness to other humans, and their interactions with and attachment to animals. Regression analysis found that relationships with humans was associated with reduced psychological distress (β =-.594, p = .001), while relationships with animals (β = .205, p = .001), particularly cats (β = .077, p = .001), was associated with increased psychological distress. Regression analysis also found that relationships with other humans (β = .522, p = .001), interactions with animals (β = .142, p = .001), and bonds with animal companions (β = .128, p = .001) were associated with increased wellbeing. We conclude by considering the groups for whom relationships with animals are most likely to offer unique benefits, and suggest the importance of continuing to examine why it is that relationships with animals are both intertwined with, yet distinct from, human-human relationships.
AB - While it is often assumed that animal companions unilaterally contribute to the wellbeing of their human companions, research has to date been equivocal. At best it appears to be that animal companionship may add an extra dimension to human lives, and thus human wellbeing. In this paper we report on a quantitative study conducted in 2021 that surveyed 2090 people with animal companions living in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Participants responded to measures asking about their wellbeing and psychological distress, their connectedness to other humans, and their interactions with and attachment to animals. Regression analysis found that relationships with humans was associated with reduced psychological distress (β =-.594, p = .001), while relationships with animals (β = .205, p = .001), particularly cats (β = .077, p = .001), was associated with increased psychological distress. Regression analysis also found that relationships with other humans (β = .522, p = .001), interactions with animals (β = .142, p = .001), and bonds with animal companions (β = .128, p = .001) were associated with increased wellbeing. We conclude by considering the groups for whom relationships with animals are most likely to offer unique benefits, and suggest the importance of continuing to examine why it is that relationships with animals are both intertwined with, yet distinct from, human-human relationships.
KW - animal companionship
KW - attachment
KW - human wellbeing
KW - psychological distress
KW - wellbeing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85196560320&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/ARC/FT130100087
U2 - 10.5502/ijw.v14i1.3005
DO - 10.5502/ijw.v14i1.3005
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85196560320
SN - 1179-8602
VL - 14
JO - International Journal of Wellbeing
JF - International Journal of Wellbeing
IS - 1
M1 - 3005
ER -